Kiwi terf has official complaint made against her for hurty words.

A well-known man in New Zealand, who says he's a woman, goes after a woman for telling no lies.

Fellow Kiwi terf, former longtime journo, and now Substack writer Yvonne van Dongen got the call from Netsafe recently. Apparently, Yvonne has word-wounded a man who says he’s a woman in one of her blogposts, and he’s made a complaint to Netsafe, New Zealand’s online safety organisation. Sounds like she must have written something devastatingly brutal.

Let’s have a look.

In her blogpost titled Gender Villains III, the aforementioned man who now calls himself Caitlin Spice, is the third of four villains mentioned there. Yvonne says this about him –

That’s it. In case you were wondering, that is the total sum of what Yvonne wrote. However, from all accounts, Spice is a serial vexatious complainer, and appears to keep as many agencies as he can busy with complaints about those who hurt his feelings. At the same time, he himself is not backward in coming forward with hurty words, as those who’ve kept screenshots of the things he’s written can attest. But, as we know, a man who says he’s a woman is given more licence to hurt, than be hurt.

Yvonne revealed his latest flounce and pounce in a note on Substack -

As any sensible person is aware, modifying one’s body with surgery or making changes to a document like a birth certificate, doesn’t change one’s biological sex. It may endow a person with a ‘legal’ sex opposite to that which they were born, but that’s a personal thing for them, and not the same as it being a law we all have to obey. Naturally, we have gender villains here trying to push the muddy word ‘gender’ into law, but that’s a different matter to birth certificates. If successful, though, the waters may get very muddy indeed, which is something gender ideologues love to bits.

However, today in New Zealand, a birth certificate does NOT compel us to regard the owner of that birth certificate to be the sex indicated on it, whether it’s been changed or not. It was once a trusted document, but sex self-ID has changed that. Now, thanks to those who fought against the introduction of sex self-ID, clause 79(2)b has been added to the BDMRR Act 2021, which says that any “other relevant information” can be taken into account to ascertain an individual’s sex. In other words, we can make a judgement based simply on what our eyes and ears tell us. We don’t have to inspect genitals, we don’t have to get it right first time about a person’s sex, and we don’t have to be brow-beaten by threats of getting into trouble with the law for ‘discrimination’, despite the bad and biased advice the Human Rights Commission gives.

A couple of years ago, I wrote about the pending introduction of sex self-ID into NZ legislation¹. I urge New Zealanders to read this, as it contains information which may help to make the matter clearer amongst all the obfuscation.

In the meantime, I stand with Yvonne during this attack on her by the aforementioned male of our human species. She’s just left the country for a few weeks’ holiday, and will no doubt return invigorated.

¹Sex self-ID anyone? Easy, cheap, and unlimited - now on offer in New Zealand.

• header image by Gordon Johnson from Pixabay