The House Built on Sand: How New Zealand’s Human Rights Commission Created Law Out of Thin Air - by Kat Karena.

NZ's Human Rights Commission knowingly gives misguidance about 'gender identity' and gender expression'.

Kat Karena, director of Active Watchful Waiting, and a New Zealander who currently calls Australia home, has written an exposé of the NZ Human Rights Commission’s wilful misguidance to both service providers and the public around the terms ‘gender identity’ and ‘gender expression’. For quite some time now, the Human Rights Commission (HRC) has advised that those malleable concepts are included in the legislation on the prohibited grounds of sex discrimination.

They’re not, and it’s a lie to say they are. However, the HRC calls this lie, in their own words, an “interpretation” of the law. Transactivists in our town and city Councils have lapped up this “interpretation” to make policies that force women and girls to share female facilities with any man who says he’s a woman. Other service providers have been duped into believing that men who say they’re women must be allowed into female spaces by law, due to the dishonest framing the HRC has created around this.

In Kat’s exposé, taken from a longer and in-depth analysis she’s done of the HRC’s deliberate misguidance in this matter, and what I myself would call corruption of the law, she writes –

The Story Nobody’s Telling

For years, New Zealand organisations—schools, sports clubs, gyms, workplaces, community groups—have been implementing policies they believe are legally required. Policies that:

• Allow males who identify as women into female changing rooms

• Include male-bodied athletes in women’s sport

• Pressure women’s organisations to admit males

• Compel pronoun use

• Treat gender identity as legally equivalent to biological sex

When challenged, they point to guidance from the Human Rights Commission. “The law requires it,” they say. “We have to comply to avoid discrimination complaints.”

But here’s the problem: the law doesn’t require it. It never has.

What New Zealand has is not “the law”—it’s an interpretation. An untested, increasingly untenable interpretation that the HRC has presented as settled fact despite having no judicial confirmation, no parliamentary enactment, and foundations that are crumbling under scrutiny.

Let me show you how this happened.

Continue reading -

The House Built on Sand: How New Zealand’s Human Rights Commission Created Law Out of Thin Air