It has become a socially sanctioned 'cloak of invisibility' and prevents our NZ community from easily understanding and recognizing the behaviours and using this info to safeguard children. Diverse sexual behaviour can be bad, actually. Just because pedophilia may be "innate" or "immutable* doesn't mean it's good. Perhaps they have 'difficult' sexual attractions and that is hard to live with but boo hoo, too bad. Our media, politicians, NGOs, teachers unions and the rest of the rainbow blob need to disassociate themselves and call out this destructive behaviour or to put it in language they use; they will find themselves"on the wrong side of history." Lest we forget PIE and NAMBLA! https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-26352378
*"Together with an amazing team of students, research assistants, and no small amount of guidance from Ray Blanchard as my mentor, the pedophiles showed important differences from non-pedophiles---and the only explanation of the differences we found was that pedophilia is an innate and probably immutable feature." http://www.jamescantor.org/research.html
So, there’s no rehabilitation for paedos, we can only keep them in line through taking an uncompromising stance against them. That isn’t the far-left’s way at all.
I think it is fairly well known in therapy circles that paedophiles are notoriously unchangeable and rarely are safely "fixed" enough to be trusted around children ever.
I know two gay men who have self-excluded from environments that might tempt their attraction to underage boys, like teaching at a boys school. They are both good and highly intelligent men.
What a disgrace. I'm just waiting for similar revelations about certain "queer theory" loving, lefty politicians to be similarly ignored here in Australia too, tbh.
(The previous qualitative literature shows that people who are sexually attracted to children struggle with the formation of a positive identity in relation to their sexuality because of its association with public stigma) and (Participants in Freimond (2013) and Walker (2020) also discussed alternative labels like “minor-attracted person” or “boy lover,” which some described as liberating and an improvement over terms like “pedophile.” Participants perceived the “minor-attracted person” label as accurate and less stigmatizing,)
Is the medical profession seriously suggesting that we need to show respect for the feelings of these monsters and give them their preferred definition.
(Although it originated within online pro-pedophile groups, the term “minor attracted person” (MAPs) has been adopted by some academic researchers as a neutral and non-stigmatizing alternative to the term “pedophile.”) and this is the real kicker
the literature broadly agreed that MAPs constitute an oppressed sexual minority who are subject to undue stigmatization and discrimination)
progressive/queer ideology = predators charter
It has become a socially sanctioned 'cloak of invisibility' and prevents our NZ community from easily understanding and recognizing the behaviours and using this info to safeguard children. Diverse sexual behaviour can be bad, actually. Just because pedophilia may be "innate" or "immutable* doesn't mean it's good. Perhaps they have 'difficult' sexual attractions and that is hard to live with but boo hoo, too bad. Our media, politicians, NGOs, teachers unions and the rest of the rainbow blob need to disassociate themselves and call out this destructive behaviour or to put it in language they use; they will find themselves"on the wrong side of history." Lest we forget PIE and NAMBLA! https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-26352378
*"Together with an amazing team of students, research assistants, and no small amount of guidance from Ray Blanchard as my mentor, the pedophiles showed important differences from non-pedophiles---and the only explanation of the differences we found was that pedophilia is an innate and probably immutable feature." http://www.jamescantor.org/research.html
So, there’s no rehabilitation for paedos, we can only keep them in line through taking an uncompromising stance against them. That isn’t the far-left’s way at all.
I think it is fairly well known in therapy circles that paedophiles are notoriously unchangeable and rarely are safely "fixed" enough to be trusted around children ever.
I know two gay men who have self-excluded from environments that might tempt their attraction to underage boys, like teaching at a boys school. They are both good and highly intelligent men.
What a disgrace. I'm just waiting for similar revelations about certain "queer theory" loving, lefty politicians to be similarly ignored here in Australia too, tbh.
I just did some research out of curiosity and found this medical paper
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9663395/
Here are a couple of quotes from it
(The previous qualitative literature shows that people who are sexually attracted to children struggle with the formation of a positive identity in relation to their sexuality because of its association with public stigma) and (Participants in Freimond (2013) and Walker (2020) also discussed alternative labels like “minor-attracted person” or “boy lover,” which some described as liberating and an improvement over terms like “pedophile.” Participants perceived the “minor-attracted person” label as accurate and less stigmatizing,)
Is the medical profession seriously suggesting that we need to show respect for the feelings of these monsters and give them their preferred definition.
And this paper
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15248380241270028
(Although it originated within online pro-pedophile groups, the term “minor attracted person” (MAPs) has been adopted by some academic researchers as a neutral and non-stigmatizing alternative to the term “pedophile.”) and this is the real kicker
the literature broadly agreed that MAPs constitute an oppressed sexual minority who are subject to undue stigmatization and discrimination)
This is unbelievable and utterly appalling.
Academics can talk themselves into believing anything, especially if they've done crazy Ph.Ds, but not only them.
Thanks, Kristina, for continuing to highlight this.
Will cross post in due course.
Dusty
Interview with the creep, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJPHX9MRmz4
Haha - love the mistranslation of "bows" into "bowels".